On a napkin
Major State RPS Targets & Years 100% 50% 0% HI 100% by 2045 CA 100% clean by 2045 NY 100% zero by 2040 NJ 50% by 2030 CT 48% by 2030 MA 35% by 2030 +1pp/yr IL 50% by 2040 PA 8% Tier I (2021) TX 5,880 MW (met)A Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) is a state law requiring electricity suppliers to source a specified percentage of their sales from renewable resources. Suppliers prove compliance by retiring Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) — one REC per MWh of renewable generation — and pay Alternative Compliance Payments (ACPs) as penalties if they fall short. The result: an RPS creates compliance demand for RECs that underpins prices in regional REC markets and drives most new renewable project development in states with binding standards. As of 2024, 29 states plus DC have an RPS; 16 have targets of at least 50%, and 4 states require 100% renewable electricity.
RPS targets vary by orders of magnitude. Hawaii requires 100% renewable by 2045; New York requires 70% by 2030 and 100% zero-emissions electricity by 2040; Texas's 5,880 MW target was met long ago and is effectively not binding. A multi-state corporate energy procurement team needs entirely different strategies for compliance-heavy NY/CA/MA than for voluntary-market-only states.
New York's CLCPA sets the most aggressive interim target — 70% renewable electricity by 2030 — though NYSERDA has acknowledged this target is unlikely to be met until approximately 2033. The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act also requires 100% zero-emissions electricity by 2040 and 85% economy-wide GHG reduction by 2050. California's SB 100 requires 60% renewable by 2030 and 100% zero-carbon by 2045. Massachusetts hit 35% in 2030 with the Class I standard increasing one percentage point per year indefinitely. New Jersey targets 50% renewable by 2030, Connecticut 48% by 2030, Hawaii 100% by 2045. Illinois requires 50% renewable by 2040 under the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act.
By contrast, Texas's RPS was a 5,880 MW target set in 1999 and met by 2009 — effectively non-binding given current Texas wind and solar installed capacity well exceeds 50,000 MW. Texas operates without effective RPS-driven REC demand; ERCOT renewable development is driven by economics and corporate PPA demand rather than state mandate.
RECs are tradable certificates issued by regional tracking systems (WREGIS in the West, M-RETS in the Midwest, NEPOOL GIS, PJM-EIS GATS, ERCOT Texas REC, etc.). One REC equals one MWh of renewable generation. Suppliers buy RECs from generators to demonstrate compliance with state RPS requirements. Prices reflect the balance between supply (renewable generation eligible for that state's program) and demand (utility compliance plus voluntary purchasing).
Recent prices: NEPOOL Class I RECs (the Northeast Class I market for new renewable generation) have traded around $40/MWh, just below the Alternative Compliance Payment rates in major states. PJM Tier I RECs trade around $30/MWh. State-specific Solar RECs (SRECs) in carve-out markets have much higher prices in supply-constrained states — NJ, MA, and DC SRECs have traded between $200-450/MWh in recent years. Unbundled national voluntary-market RECs trade much lower (often $1-5/MWh), reflecting weaker additionality signals.
For corporate buyers, RPS markets matter in three ways. PPA pricing reflects the value of RECs the project produces — a solar project in an RPS-eligible state with strong REC demand generates significantly more value per MWh than the same project in a non-RPS state, supporting more favorable PPA terms for offtakers. Green tariff design reflects underlying RPS overcompliance — utility green tariffs are typically funded by RECs the utility procures beyond compliance needs, with pricing that reflects the marginal cost of incremental renewable generation. Additionality concerns are real: a corporate buyer purchasing voluntary RECs from a project that would have been built anyway for RPS compliance may not be driving additional renewable development. This is why high-quality corporate procurement increasingly emphasizes long-term PPAs with new projects rather than unbundled REC purchases.
Common questions
Related reading on The Outlet