A 5 MW manufacturing facility should use a layered procurement strategy: start indexed, hedge in 20–25% tranches as the market offers favorable pricing, and maintain 20–30% indexed for flexibility. Avoid the two most common mistakes—locking everything in on a single day, and doing nothing until the contract expires.
Before making procurement decisions, understand what you’re paying for. A typical 5 MW bill breaks down into several components:
Even a perfect commodity strategy only controls part of the equation. Load management and peak demand reduction matter just as much.
|
Timing |
Action |
Cumulative Hedge |
|
Month 1–2 |
Start on index. Monitor forward curves for entry points. |
0% |
|
Month 3–4 |
First tranche: lock in 25% if forwards dip below target. |
25% |
|
Month 5–7 |
Second tranche: add 20–25% if conditions are favorable. |
45–50% |
|
Month 8–10 |
Third tranche: bring total to 60–75%. |
60–75% |
|
Ongoing |
Maintain 25–40% indexed. Hedge more only on exceptional pricing. |
60–75% |
The right strategy can save a 5 MW facility $150,000–$300,000 annually compared to a naive fixed lock or unmanaged index. The key is discipline: hedge in layers, manage capacity, and work with an advisor who watches the market so you don’t have to.
What is the best energy procurement strategy for a manufacturer?
For most mid-sized manufacturers (3–10 MW), layered hedging works best: start indexed, hedge in 20–25% tranches over time, and maintain some indexed exposure for flexibility.
How much can a 5 MW facility save with better procurement?
Savings of $150,000–$300,000 annually are realistic, depending on market conditions. The savings come from avoiding the risk premium in fixed contracts and timing hedges to favorable conditions.
What are capacity costs and why do they matter?
Capacity costs are charges based on your facility’s peak demand contribution. In PJM, these have surged to levels where a 5 MW facility may pay $250K–$400K annually. Reducing peak demand during system peaks can significantly lower this cost.